Dario Codipietro

Series · 2026 · Founder

Building Fiuto

In the last few months I independently built and designed Fiuto.ai, an end-to-end AI user research automation tool. To design and build it solo I had to rely heavily on agentic workflows, which I designed to replicate the way a real product team works, from discovery to design to delivery.

Role
Founder
Team
Solo, with Claude Code
Recorded
30 Jun to 15 Jul 2026
/ux review atomic components in ladle and propose visual updates
01Baseline ux-baseline
02Review ux-review
03Ideate ux-ideate
04Translate ux-translate
05Fidelity ux-visual-review
Stories in Ladle
Issues by severity
Round 1 of 3
Picked
Stories, from the pick
Ready to ship
Faithful to the pick
One sessionunder two hours, no handoff

The /ux family on a surface that already exists. One orchestrator and five skills in a single session: it grounds itself in the current stories, ranks what needs fixing, puts variants up for me to pick, translates the pick into components and checks what was built against it.

01Parts 01 to 02

Core flows in automated design

Redesigning surfaces that already exist: first a batch of simple admin components, then a complex panel with states and variants, both inside the coding agent and without a Figma handoff.

Watch the playlist ↗

which studies have i shared, and with whom?
Code Data Roadmap
Round 3 of 3 Picked
States, mobile, both themes Reused
Phase A Phase B Deferred 1 blocker
Merged, migration pending
Private, shared with two
One day, ideation to delivery 3 decisions from me
The question Grounded Option B Components Two phases On staging Live

One feature from question to production. The card on the board is remade at every step: grounded in research, narrowed to a direction, drawn as components, planned in phases, checked on staging, then live. The three marks on the track are the points where I decide.

02Parts 03 to 06

A new feature from design to delivery

One feature followed end to end: grounded from scratch, handed off as real components, planned and built in verified phases, then released to production.

Watch the playlist ↗

Competitors
Adjacent sectors
User journeys
Best practice
Kept
A public toggle Sharing MCP parity Parked
Direction
One feature About six hours, project to staging Two defects after delivery
A whole journey Agreed screen by screen

Where a direction comes from. Four weekly scans feed one synthesis, and the synthesis reopens a roadmap decision: an option is struck out, the rest are ranked or parked. The two lanes on the right are the work that follows.

03Parts 07 to 09

Using research in automated design workflows

Where the direction comes from: a weekly competitive read that reopens a roadmap decision, the delivery that follows one of its findings, and the prototype a whole journey needs before it can be judged.

Watch the playlist ↗

One delivered feature Ten agents in real browsers
15 passed 3 failed GenPkgGenAppApp
One session

A QA pass run by agents. The orchestrator fans one build out to ten browsers, each driven by its own agent collecting passes and failures. What comes back is a single report: what held, what broke, and the defects ranked with the layer each belongs to.

04Parts 10 to 12

Reviewing and improving implemented experiences

What happens once the code lands: an implemented flow walked against the design it came from, the visual touches that give the product its tone, and a QA review run by agents in real browsers.

Watch the playlist ↗

Contact

Get in touch

Product design lead across research, design systems and handover, with coding agents in the loop. Contract, outside IR35, or a permanent lead role.

Available
Now
Location
London, remote or hybrid, UK and EU
Right to work
UK settled status, EU citizen

Send a message

The role, the team, the timing. It reaches me directly.